> I think the title should be changed to something like "Line > Identification Destination Option" as it is proposing to create a new > destination option and uses tunneling. In other words, it is no > longer adding line identification to RS messages.
makes sense. but should not be a prereq for wg taking the document on, which i support. randy -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
