>RJ Atkinson wrote:
>I'm told that some users already are using implementation-specific
>configuration mechanisms (e.g. apparently a MS-Windows "Registry"
>setting) that allow SLAAC, but disallow the privacy extension.
>I'm further told that when configured to disable "privacy-mode",
>such hosts then create the EUI-64 based on some MAC address
>in the host.
>I'm told that outcome is quite sufficient for audit purposes,
>but is expensive and tedious to deploy -- primarily because
>the configuration is platform-dependent.
>This proposal would provide an platform-independent way
>to configure that sort of knob, which knob apparently exists
>now within an interesting number of deployed end systems.
I agree.
Yu Hua bing
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
