Le 16 mars 2011 à 07:30, Christian Huitema a écrit : ... > In fact, rather than your draft proposing to not use privacy addresses, we > should pursue the deprecation of using EUI-64 in addresses.
-1 > The worst part of your draft is that , if we published it, it would give the > impression that for the IETF, EUI-64 addresses are more secure than privacy > addresses. This is obviously false. But they are more stable by default, a feature that can be useful where privacy isn't a must. RD > > -- Christian Huitema > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
