Ran,

On May 12, 2011, at 7:55 AM, RJ Atkinson wrote:

> On Friday 6th May 2011, Ole Troan wrote in part:
>> basically I want the document to say that IETF has standardised
>> two mechanisms to configure hosts. one using ND and one using DHCP.
>> As they apply to different management models, nodes SHOULD implement both. 
> 
> On 12th May 2011, Thomas Narten responded in part:
>> I personally would support having DHCP be a SHOULD rather than a
>> MAY. The justification in my mind is that if you want the network
>> operator to have the choice of whether they want to use  Stateless
>> addrconf OR DHCP, they only have that choice of devices widely
>> implement both.
> 
> I share the views above.  One wonders whether others also do.
> 
> In some environments, IPv6 actually is NOT deployable unless/until 
> DHCP for IPv6 is widely supported in IPv6 nodes.  
> 
> I agree with others here that cable modem deployments (e.g. DOCSIS)
> are one example where all node provisioning is handled via DHCP.  
> A certain FTTH service that I myself use is a second example 
> where DHCP is the node provisioning method.  Numerous corporate,
> enterprise, educational, or government environments provide a 
> 3rd example where DHCP for IPv6 is a pre-requisite for IPv6 deployment.


While my personal view is that DHCPv6 won't be used for host configuration in 
cable/DSL deployments (except for provisioning the prefix to the home router), 
it appears that DHCPv6 is being widely implemented in host OS's because it is 
needed some environments.  There are enough variations in deployment models 
that a host developer will need to support both.  

Based on this, I think a SHOULD is OK. 

I do note that I had a conversation with a content provider who worked closely 
with a mobile provider, and was surprised to learn that they planned to use 
SLAACC for their servers because it made their job easier.  So I don't think we 
know what all people deploying IPv6 are going to do in this area.  

Bob


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to