Hi Mark, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Smith 
> [mailto:i...@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 2:16 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: Thomas Narten; Brzozowski, John; Bob Hinden; ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD
> 
> Hi Fred,
> 
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 10:51:14 -0700
> "Templin, Fred L" <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Thomas, 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On 
> > > Behalf Of Thomas Narten
> > > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 1:11 PM
> > > To: Brzozowski, John
> > > Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; Bob Hinden
> > > Subject: Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY 
> to SHOULD
> > > 
> > > > Is the intention for the new text to relax the requirement for
> > > > auto-configuration?
> > > 
> > > No. SLAAC remains a MUST. DHCPv6 though is now a SHOULD.
> > > 
> > > For one thing, DHCP doesn't have an option configure 
> on-link prefixes,
> > > so we still need SLAAC.
> > 
> > Not all links will necessarily require on-link prefixes. For
> > those, DHCPv6 alone may be sufficient.
> > 
> 
> Out of curiosity, wouldn't link locals be classified as SLAAC
> addresses (as in, their configuration is stateless and
> they're autoconfigured by default)? I understand you're saying that
> there are scenarios where RA's wouldn't contain a PIO, or perhaps the
> PIO wouldn't have then on-link flag set, however I'm curious if saying
> that SLAAC isn't necessary in that scenario is also implying that
> link-locals may not be necessary either?

Good point; yes, even DHCPv6 requires link-locals. The
link-locals could be manually configured, but it seems
reasonable to assume that they would often be autoconfigured
using SLAAC.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com


> Thanks,
> Mark.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to