Hi Doug, On Tue, 24 May 2011 15:36:31 -0700 Doug Barton <do...@dougbarton.us> wrote:
> On 05/24/2011 15:00, Templin, Fred L wrote: > > Good point; yes, even DHCPv6 requires link-locals. The > > link-locals could be manually configured, but it seems > > reasonable to assume that they would often be autoconfigured > > using SLAAC. > > I'm confused (nothing new about that). In FreeBSD the OS creates the > LLA, which is then used for rtsol, etc. Are we doing it wrong? > No. I was more clarifying/observing that if link-locals are classified as SLAAC addresses, a pure non-SLAAC environment is impossible because of the required presence of link-locals for purposes such as those you mention. Regards, Mark. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
