Hi Brian, Am 28.09.2011 23:07, schrieb Brian E Carpenter: > On 2011-09-28 23:08, Roland Bless wrote: > ... >> The current ULA-C... > > What do you mean? There is no current definition of ULA-C.
That's right :-) I was referring to the definition in RFC 4193 with L=0, i.e., centrally assigned ULAs. I know that the registry and assignment procedure for ULA-C are not defined yet, but the basic format will be the same as in RFC 4193. The few I-D proposals for ULA-Cs seemed to suggest allocating /48s and not larger address blocks and I could very well imagine, that this will be the case if we ever define ULA-Cs. That was what I meant. Regards, Roland -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
