Hi Brian, I was not questioning about connectivity (or divide Internet). I was just looking for an explanation of how the proposal could be MORE effective *and* more economical.
Lixia On Apr 10, 2012, at 7:31 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Lixia, > > The original note says "I think it is possible to locate the node we need." > > So, the idea is apparently not to divide the Internet - it is simply to deal > with the fact that addresses would be ambiguous. Since we have 15 years > experience of the pain caused by ambiguous addresses, and a perfectly good > 128 bit address space that avoids any need for ambiguous addresses, I don't > see the point. It isn't even worth sending the code. > > Pars, > > Your original note also says "I am not here to discuss these details." Sorry, > but in the IETF it's *exactly* the details that we must discuss; that's our > job. We've been doing so since 1992 to my personal knowledge. > > Regards > Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
