On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Manfredi, Albert E < albert.e.manfr...@boeing.com> wrote:
> Yes, that was also my reaction. Why one Internet? Because Internet means > tying together multiple separate networks. Of course you can have the same > addresses on the different networks. Nothing new there either. That’s why > we have NATs, NAPTs, and IPv6 NPTs.**** > > ** ** > > No one is forcing an ISP or an enterprise network to use a combination of > protocols. They can already opt to be IPv4 only, or IPv6 only, or dual > stack, or eventually IPv7. Matter of fact, years ago, our enterprise had an > assortment of different networks, tied together by Softswitch gateways. > IPv4, SNA, DECnet.**** > > ** > I have no problem with anyone. I am facing my own illusions. Here is my conclusion after years of work on IPv6. IPv6 guy is just a salesman. But the salesman thought the entire world should buy his product. The product cannot change. There is no other product. Not even sure the product was really needed. Complete delusion. Pars > ** > > Bert**** > > ** ** > > *From:* ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf > Of *Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:54 PM > *To:* Pars Mutaf > *Cc:* ipv6@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: Why one Internet?**** > > ** ** > > Wasn't this what the Internet was supposed to be? I'm tempted to ask how > old you are, but I don't want to be rude. > > As the Monty Python would put it: 'You see, the key is in the name - Inter > - net(work)' > > :-) > > cheers > > Carlos > > **** >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
