On 10/20/2012 9:36 AM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: >> There is also the question of availability of DHCP software on smaller >> platforms which have no SIM card. It may be easier to do this with ND >> in smaller settings. > > The obvious conclusion to this argument is that a *lot* of DHCP > functionality will be duplicated in ND. Is this where we want to go? > > I'm coming from the DHCP side of the argument. In my world DHCP is > needed because it gives you a single place to handle dynamic address > allocation, *and* it ties in with all sorts of support & backend > systems. > > I am against adding lots of new ND functionality until we have DHCPv6 > that is considerably more feature complete. Some of this is probably > coming (client MAC address), some of it is still being opposed for > mostly religious reasons (e.g. running DHCP without RA). > > Steinar Haug, AS 2116
+1 on all counts. Doug -- I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something. And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what I can do. -- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909) -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------