Hi, Ben, On 05/21/2013 06:05 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > I'm not sure my last set of comments got to you; I kept getting email > bounces. In any case, this version addressed all but one of my > comments: > > -- section 3, paragraphs starting with "The Interface_ID [Now > Net_Iface] is a value..." > > You say the following properties are "desirable", but then go on to > state them with MUSTs in the following bullet points. This is > ambiguous. If they are only "desirable properties", then the > normative language is not appropriate. If you mean the MUSTs, then > these are _requirements_.
Agreed. For instance, Karl Auer reported this one a couple of days ago. I'll be s/desired/required/ in the upcoming -08 version. Thanks so much! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
