On 06/13/2013 12:07 AM, Joe Touch wrote: > > On 6/12/2013 2:44 PM, Fernando Gont wrote: >>> just to be clear I'm not against the IETF documenting e.g. in a BCP, >>> what the longest expected header chain should be. >> >> Well, that seems more std track than bcp to me. > > If it's an operational recommendation (SHOULD because that's all that > routers are expected to support), then it would be BCP. > > If you want to prohibit hosts from generating longer chains, that would > be std track.
I want to recommend hosts not to send such packets. Hence it looks like std track. Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
