On 6/12/2013 2:44 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
just to be clear I'm not against the IETF documenting e.g. in a BCP, what the longest expected header chain should be.
>
Well, that seems more std track than bcp to me.
If it's an operational recommendation (SHOULD because that's all that routers are expected to support), then it would be BCP.
If you want to prohibit hosts from generating longer chains, that would be std track.
Joe -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
