Ralph Droms <rdroms.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This draft is on the 6man agenda for Berlin. I expect the discussion
> will be taken up there.
> In my opinion, the multicast scope should not be tied, thought the
> words in the description of the scope, to the address assignment
> architecture.
Do you have a specific use case that you are thinking of?
How can it be tied to the subnet, and yet not be related to the address
assignment architecture? Can you suggest another definition?
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
pgpxlN9kAqH_x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
