----- Original Message -----
> From: Robert Cragie <robert.cra...@gridmerge.com>
> To: r...@ietf.org; 6...@ietf.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, 24 July 2013 3:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [Roll] trickle-mcast-04 - Clarify scope value of 3 -
> subnet-local
>
> +1
>
> So "subnet" is not the right term. I think "network" as
> Ralph wrote is
> fine but if the disassociation with network addressing needs to be
> clear, why not use the term "domain"? After all, trickle-mcast talks
> about MPL Domains. I appreciate it may have some pre-established
> connotations but from an abstract definition point of view, "domain"
> seems eligible enough.
>
I think "domain" is really good when there is a qualifier on the front e.g.,
addressing domain, routing domain, multicast domain etc.
Regards,
Mark.
> Robert
>
> On 16/07/2013 23:59, Ralph Droms wrote:
>> This draft is on the 6man agenda for Berlin. I expect the discussion will
> be taken up there.
>>
>> In my opinion, the multicast scope should not be tied, thought the words in
> the description of the scope, to the address assignment architecture.
>>
>> - Ralph
>>
>> On Jul 16, 2013, at 1:41 PM, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)"
> <pthub...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi:
>>>
>>>>> "subnet" implies that this multicast scope must
> derive from the address
>>>>> assignment topology. The first (and only) use case is derived
> from the
>>>>> /64 prefix; do we want to have that limitation for all uses of
> scope
>>>>> 0x03?
>>>> I think so.
>>> Same here.
>>>
>>> Pascal
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Roll mailing list
>>> r...@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> r...@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
