Having had a number of private exchanges with Ralph, I support the document as worded.
It was not clear to me before that trickle-mcast will be *expected* to define what it means for the scope to be "defined automatically from the network topology" I thought that further clarification of the use of scope-3 within MPL would be considered an infringment upon 6man's charter. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
pgp1PLlJBdsWE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
