gnodet commented on PR #1080:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1080#issuecomment-1497298619

   > Great to see these changes! I think the `is(Not)Empty` cases to move away 
from utils can also be reflected in an automated migration if you'd like me to 
roll that out across all of Maven. I think that was the most common use of 
utils.
   > 
   > Other cases that came up in discussion elsewhere are not as clear in the 
general case, but can be automated in specific cases. For instance the utils 
`split` methods take a separator as a literal, rather than the regex it can be 
for `String.split`. We can explore what we can replace with JDK calls already, 
now, and I'll hold off on further Commons Lang changes while we do so.
   > 
   > I'm traveling this week, so can't fully dive in, but hope to revisit the 
automations next week. Let me know if there's any over replacements that you'd 
like to distill from this one. Only looking to help & amplify changes such as 
this PR.
   
   Yes, the `split` calls can be translated directly when the separator is a 
one-char string.  Other cases may need to be handled differently.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to