dsmiley commented on PR #3423:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3423#issuecomment-3194426331

   > 2. You can create a ctor-param for each dimension maybe. This starts to 
make the ctor's a little unwieldy to call
   
   Right.  As I look at GenericSolrCollection, I've completely lost motivation 
to follow through with this.  So I don't know how to make both of us happy now. 
 I'll repeat that I think the collection or node level is a significant enough 
matter that it's worthy of being in the class hierarchy.  I wouldn't say that 
for the other booleans other than V2.  I guess I'll back out the class I added 
and live with GenericSolrCollection.  I don't like that it's easy to overlook 
the request type.  Maybe the constructors that don't take that should be 
deprecated; shrug.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to