> -----Original Message----- > From: IVI [mailto:ivi-boun...@lists.tizen.org] On Behalf Of Jussi Laako > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 11:53 AM > To: Wang, Quanxian > > [Wang, Quanxian]Is it related with multiple display? Multiple seat? > No. > > Yes it is. Let's say there are two persons at the backseat, they both > want to read and write emails on their own accounts. Post on twitter > and facebook.
I think you all misunderstand mr Wang a little. This discussion is around whether we can take multiple user out of the picture (for multiple displays and seats) where most of you seem to suggest that this is what Wang is suggesting here. And that is not true. Tizen is providing a platform. A platform that should be flexible for manufacturers to do whatever they need. Mr Wang is not taking multiple users out of the questions. He's just not talking about them. Platform provides some features. One of them is multiple displays/seat, the other (independently) multiple users. Mr. Wang I just suggesting not to merge them in the Tizen implementation. To make them flexible. Not to limit yourself to one display+seat+user. If someone will want to make 2 displays per one user, fine, let him. If someone doesn't want multiple users at all (for whatever reason), fine, let him. If someone wants strictly one display+seat+user let him as well. But don't limit the options. On the implementation level those 2 features could be independent. But this doesn't mean they can't (or even should) be used together. This is what mr Wang is saying here. Functionally they are related (or can be related, depending on the use case). Not necessarily in the Weston/wayland implementation itself. _______________________________________________ IVI mailing list IVI@lists.tizen.org https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi