Re: [PROPOSAL] build structure jakarta-commons

[Sam Ruby]

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>That's not the issue.  It's a build-script dependency that I am
>advocating a solution for, not a functional one. And didn't you just
>suggest exactly that in the last post?  In the context of a snapshot for
>users :
>
>Sam Ruby :
>>> Now, can we begin a discussion as to what would be maximally useful?
>>> Let me start:
>>>
>>>  I believe that a snapshot of *just* the sources of cactus, combined
with
>>>  the exact versions of the dependent jars needed to produce what you
see
>>>  posted on the gump site would be useful to some.  That way if Gump
>>>  reports an error, you can download and unpack a single file and
>>>  reproduce it.  Does anybody else think this would be useful?

I am not advocating a build script dependency.

The exact versions of the dependent jars needed to reproduce the results
shown on the gump site would be those that were just built minute before
from source.

- Sam Ruby