-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DIGEST] April 22, 2001



----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [DIGEST] April 22, 2001


>
>
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Peter Donald wrote:
>
> > At 02:15  23/4/01 -0700, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
>
> One technical note that affects both Commons and Taglibs is the fact that
> CVS branches are global to an entire repository.  Therefore, if one taglib
> (or Commons package) creates a branch "rel2", then nobody else can use
> that name.  We might want to think a little more about the long term
> impacts of this little detail.
>

Why don't we adopt the convention : <component name>_REL_<release version> ?

For example, for version 1.1 of cactus that would be : CACTUS_REL_11

So that there will be no name conflict with other components.

> Craig
>
Vincent

Please remember that you need a tag for the branch AND the release. Every
release is also a branch point, for bug fixes to that release. Even minor
releases. For example, if you discover a security bug in release 1.3, you
need to get 1.3.1 out. Even if work has proceeded to 1.4. 

CACTUS_REL_11 should be

CACTUS_REL_1_1 and CACTUS_REL_1_1_BRANCH

Along the 1.1 branch you might also have CACTUS_REL_1_1_1, CACTUS_REL_1_1_2
and so on. CACTUS_REL_1_1_0 == CACTUS_REL_1_1, the initial release of Cactus
1.1.

Main development should always be on the trunk. XEmacs messed this up, and
the developers have regretted it deeply since. With the recent release,
they've done some massive repository surgery so that the main dev branch is
back on the trunk.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>This electronic mail transmission
may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s)
named.  Any use, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
the sender via e-mail. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Reply via email to