> I suggest packaging the IO-related generic-utils as a commons.io > component, the lang-related utils as a commons.lang component, etc. I'm in complete agreement. > > Otherwise we have org.apache.commons.util.top-level-jdk-pkg... for > every class. And that is supposed to *scale*? *erm.. shifts feet, stares at ground*
- cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/util/src/java/org/... dlr
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/util/src/... bayard
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/util/... Daniel Rall
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/u... bayard
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/u... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: cvs commit:jakarta-commons-sandbo... Jon Stevens
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-... bayard
- generic-utils (was Re: cvs c... Charles Burdick
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-... bayard
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-... Craig R. McClanahan
- Util dependency on Collections? Daniel Rall
- Re: Util dependency on Collectio... James Strachan
- Re: Util dependency on Colle... bayard
- Re: Util dependency on C... James Strachan
- Re: Util dependency on C... bayard
- Re: Util dependency on C... James Strachan
- Re: Util dependency on C... Jari Worsley
- Re: Util dependency on C... bayard
- Re: Util dependency on C... Jari Worsley