> So: keep it the same unless you have a very good reason not to. And if > this is the case, keep it similar, so users can easly adapt their code > and maybe even predict the interface.
Fully agree. BTW I like your i2c API libs. Clean, simple. Did not have time to test them, but I will ! (testing master/slave comm. between 2 16f88) > It should be extracted! Take a look at print.jal or format.jal how > this can be done. Do you mean these lcd_date, ... proc could be put in print.jal or format.jal ? So every output device lib could use it ? Seb --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
