> What is it you're asking me? > It looks that I can spend some time on jallib this week. Say what you > think is most important for releasing jallib and within my reach. If > you don't, i'll probably start with a layer on top of the i2c lib to > make it even more easy to use ;)
We (you and I) have mostly discussed about this point (tests, test results, test pages), so I was thinking about starting to deal with it, with your help, advices, vision, etc... Now, we're on the path of a beta release, testing stuff will have to wait for the final release. What the most important for releasing a beta jallib is IMHO to be prepared to fix a lot of little things :) I suggest to stop adding new libs for the release so we have a stable group of files to be validated. Again, that's just my opinion, if you think a new layer on top of i2c would be the killing feature, go, go, go ! For the final release, we need to deal with tests. I was planning to include test features to the jallib wrapper (that was to trigger to create it), so I first need to finish it. Once done, I'll propose something to deal with tests. Seb --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
