I'd suggest to keep the build scripts for some time and have them just output to the user what to do to build and the location of the Ant site and download.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I can see the advantage to that , admittedly I'm new, but i could'nt get > some > of the buildfiles with junit tasks to run until i started using my own > ant and junit, but maybe theres a trick to it. Maybe Junit is another good > candidate for this treatment. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 13 August 2002 11:53 > To: James Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we remove ant? (was RE: Phoenix 4.0 beta) > > > +1 > > -- > Serge Knystautas > Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites > http://www.lokitech.com > > Peter M. Goldstein wrote: > >>Assuming that the requirement is documented on the web page (including >>required ant version) I'll give that yea vote. >> >>+1 from me (with above caveat) >> >>--Peter >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 11:41 AM >>>To: James Developers List >>>Subject: [VOTE] Should we remove ant? (was RE: Phoenix 4.0 beta) >>> >>> >>>Quick poll... >>> >>>should we remove ant from cvs, and assume that anyone interested will >> >>get >> >> >>>it themselves? >>> >>>+1 from me to kick it off. >>> >>>d. >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
