Do you have any hard numbers to support this? The last time I checked, gcj had minimal improvement over JVM 1.5.
-----Original Message----- From: Vic Bancroft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 9:31 AM To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Results (Re: Survey: Lucene and Java 1.4 vs. 1.5) Until there is a free java 5 alternative, it would be nice to have a clean compile in 1.4. We might also consider waiting until gcj does the 1.5 move, since some of us are loving the native binaries, particularly on x86_64. How else can you index billions of documents (aside from expensive big blue boxes) . . . more, l8r, v -- "The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet." -- William Gibson, quoted by Whitfield Diffie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
