Tatu Saloranta wrote on 06/17/2006 06:54 AM: > And it's > bit curious as to what the current mad rush regarding > migration is -- beyond the convenience and syntactic > sugar, only the concurrency package seems like a > tempting immediate reason? >
The only people who keep bringing up these non-arguments are those on the con side. You should read the arguments on the pro side -- they are not these. > I hope it can be a practical decision made with > cool minds. > Agreed. I think a key part of this is to listen to what the other side is saying. This all boils down to people and the environments they use. People using 1.4 want the latest and greatest Lucene and don't understand why it's important to use 1.5 anyway. People using 1.5 are writing 1.5 code everyday and want to be able to make contributions to Lucene without backporting and retesting. Also, they don't want to consciously write code that might be a Lucene contribution in 1.4 because a) the cognitive shift back to 1.4 is not easy once you are fully indoctrinated into 1.5 (primarily generics), and b) 1.4 code is not type-safe in the sense that 1.5 code is. So, do 1.4 people live with Lucene 2.0.x until they move to 1.5, or do 1.5 people get limited or cut out from making contributions. Neither option is appealing, especially to those negative affected. Chuck --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]