If you want some inspiration on how to remove duplication in data fixtures, take a look at Nat Pryce's make-it-easy library up on googlecode. Would be very interested to see those ideas expressed in Scala, with or without db support.
Dan On Oct 23, 4:19 pm, Ken Egervari <ken.egerv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I do (hopefully). > > It's not implemented yet, but it's next on the list, and it shouldn't > be too difficult. Perhaps I'll run the idea by you and you can let me > know if this fixes it for you. > > The framework already has a way to specify labels, so you can label a > record like this: > > country: > - [Canada] country_id: 1, name: "Canada" > - [United States] country_id: 2, name: "United States" > > Of course, there's some redundancy there, so you can pass in an > expression to the name property like this: > > country: > - [Canada] country_id: 1, name: $label > - [United States] country_id: 2, name: $label > > That gets rid of the duplication in text whenever it's needed, but we > still have the duplication where name=$label, so we can use default > values to refactor that. > > country: > ? name: $label > - [Canada] country_id: 1 > - [United States] country_id: 2 > > So far, everything has been implemented as shown. The next steps have > not, but will be. > > I agree that ids are a messy way to reference data that leaves a lot > to be desired. One thing we can do is get the framework to generate > the ids... that way we can access the rows from labels instead: > > country: [pk: country_id] > ? name: $label > - [Canada] > - [United States] > > This doesn't work for pk's consisting for of two or more columns, but > it's going to work in 99% of cases where you are pulling a root object > that is needed for test against. > > Now, one thing I've left out is a name space for the label. It's > implied because of the table name. The reason it's important for > references later. The syntax could look something like this: > > province: [pk: province_id] > - name: $label > - [Ontario] province_id: $country(Canada) > - [New York] province_id: $country(United States) > > I haven't really decided yet yet to put these in quotes or notes. I'll > have to see what feels natural and looks best. Maybe this looks > better?: > > province: [pk: province_id] > - name: $label > - ["Ontario"] province_id: $country("Canada") > - ["New York"] province_id: $country("United States") > > Anyway, in your test code, you could do something like this: > > val province = provinceDao.find( "Ontario".toId ) > > "toId" could be an implicit that maps Strings (or Symbols I guess) to > a wrapper that has a toId() method. The implicit will return the same > id that the framework generated when it parsed in all the test data. > > Does this approach solve the problem? Suggestions/improvements? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.