Jules, how about making the jetty-plugin.sar just contain the jars and have a 
seperate jetty-service.xml?

--jason


On Friday 31 May 2002 04:31 pm, Jules Gosnell wrote:
> Scott,
>
> Would you mind if I moved the jasper.jar from lib/ to jetty-plugin.sar ?
>
> I figure:
> - jasper is an implementation
> - jasper version is tightly bound to Jetty version
> - Tomcat users will have their own version of Jasper
>
> I think the servlet api jar should stay in lib, seeing as this is part
> of the definition of the JBoss platform and will be needed by users to
> compile against (whilst they should not need Jetty and Jasper classes)
>
> My preemptive advice to anyone concerned that a sar is awkward to work
> with, because the configuration is, hidden is : "run it unpacked".
>
> Concerns ?
>
>
> Jules
>
> P.S.
>
> What is the arrangement between HEAD and Branch_3_0 - would I be
> correct in assuming that bug-fixes should be merged, but new features
> not ?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


_______________________________________________________________

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm

_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to