yes.. please.. jboss-mq would benefit also. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain > Sundstrom > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool > > > I agree, but all of our stuff can use it. This would make it much > easier to debug thread problems (like the interrupted bug). > > -dain > > Scott M Stark wrote: > > Its a good idea to have such a service available, but using it cannot > > be a requirement for integration at this point as in general we cannot > > get a third party to use our thread pool. The pool component should > > really just fall out of the JCA work. > > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Scott Stark > > Chief Technology Officer > > JBoss Group, LLC > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:21 AM > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool > > > > > > > >>I think it would be cool to have a centralized thread pool mbean that > >>anyone that needs a worker thread goes to. The pool would need to be > >>partitioned, but that is fairly simple. > >> > >>What do you think? > >> > >>-dain > >> > >>Sacha Labourey wrote: > >> > >>>Cool. But do you mean that each part/module of JBoss consuming threads > >>>should hood in JCA? Isn't that overkill? > >>> > >>>For example, the invokers, great consumers of threads, will > they need to > >>>hook in JCA? How do you see that? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>-----Message d'origine----- > >>>>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de > >>>>David Jencks > >>>>Envoy� : jeudi, 29 ao�t 2002 15:49 > >>>>� : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>Objet : Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>One of the parts of jca 1.5 is a thread pool with transaction import > >>>>capabilities. (Work contracts) I hope to get this committed > in the next > >>>>couple of days, it's written and somewhat tested. > >>>> > >>>>david jencks > >>>> > >>>>On 2002.08.29 09:21:01 -0400 Sacha Labourey wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Hello, > >>>>> > >>>>>As part of JBoss monitoring, the thread usage is a very interesting > >>>>>indication. Furthermore, for performance reasons, having a > thread pool > >>>>>would > >>>>>be a good thing (TM). > >>>>> > >>>>>What do you think about integrating a thread pool in JBoss? > >>>> > >>>>Parts such as > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>JavaGroups would also need to be integrated in this > framework (JG is a > >>>>>big > >>>>>thread consumer) > >>>>> > >>>>>David, Mr. Pool ;), what do you think about it? > >>>>> > >>>>>Cheers, > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>Sacha > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >>>>>Welcome to geek heaven. > >>>>>http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >>>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>>Jboss-development mailing list > >>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >>>>Welcome to geek heaven. > >>>>http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>Jboss-development mailing list > >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>------------------------------------------------------- > >>>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >>>Welcome to geek heaven. > >>>http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>Jboss-development mailing list > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > >> > >> > >>-- > >>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>Dain Sundstrom > >>Chief Architect JBossCMP > >>JBoss Group, LLC > >>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > >> > >> > >>------------------------------------------------------- > >>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >>Welcome to geek heaven. > >>http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Jboss-development mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > >> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > -- > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Dain Sundstrom > Chief Architect JBossCMP > JBoss Group, LLC > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
