dmitry, dive, mf
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Dmitri Colebatch > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool > > > I might be interested, although it sounds like something > that's fairly quick and easy - so might be simpler for an > existing developer to do it. > > To clarify my understanding though - you're talking about a > JMX service that pools threads. so a fairly simple pool with > the obvious configuration options yes? > > If the relevant ppl who need threads could let know where > they currently get threads, I'd be happy to get stuck into > this tonight (GMT+10) and post a patch. > > cheers > dim > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 12:06 PM > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool > > > > So we all agree this is a good idea. > > > > Who's going to pick up the ball and run with it? > > > > -dain > > > > Hiram Chirino wrote: > > > yes.. please.. jboss-mq would benefit also. > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of > > >>Dain Sundstrom > > >>Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:56 AM > > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool > > >> > > >> > > >>I agree, but all of our stuff can use it. This would > make it much > > >>easier to debug thread problems (like the interrupted bug). > > >> > > >>-dain > > >> > > >>Scott M Stark wrote: > > >> > > >>>Its a good idea to have such a service available, but using it > > >>>cannot be a requirement for integration at this point as > in general > > >>>we cannot get a third party to use our thread pool. The pool > > >>>component should really just fall out of the JCA work. > > >>> > > >>>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >>>Scott Stark > > >>>Chief Technology Officer > > >>>JBoss Group, LLC > > >>>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >>>----- Original Message ----- > > >>>From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>>Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:21 AM > > >>>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>>I think it would be cool to have a centralized thread > pool mbean > > >>>>that anyone that needs a worker thread goes to. The pool would > > >>>>need to be partitioned, but that is fairly simple. > > >>>> > > >>>>What do you think? > > >>>> > > >>>>-dain > > >>>> > > >>>>Sacha Labourey wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>>Cool. But do you mean that each part/module of JBoss consuming > threads > > >>>>>should hood in JCA? Isn't that overkill? > > >>>>> > > >>>>>For example, the invokers, great consumers of threads, will > > >>>> > > >>they need to > > >> > > >>>>>hook in JCA? How do you see that? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>>>-----Message d'origine----- > > >>>>>>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De > la part > > >>>>>>de David Jencks Envoy� : jeudi, 29 ao�t 2002 15:49 > > >>>>>>� : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>>>>Objet : Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>One of the parts of jca 1.5 is a thread pool with transaction > > >>>>>>import capabilities. (Work contracts) I hope to get this > > >>>>>>committed > > >>>>> > > >>in the next > > >> > > >>>>>>couple of days, it's written and somewhat tested. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>david jencks > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>On 2002.08.29 09:21:01 -0400 Sacha Labourey wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>>Hello, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>As part of JBoss monitoring, the thread usage is a very > > >>>>>>>interesting indication. Furthermore, for performance > reasons, > > >>>>>>>having a > > >>>>>> > > >>thread pool > > >> > > >>>>>>>would > > >>>>>>>be a good thing (TM). > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>What do you think about integrating a thread pool in JBoss? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>Parts such as > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>>JavaGroups would also need to be integrated in this > > >>>>>> > > >>framework (JG is a > > >> > > >>>>>>>big > > >>>>>>>thread consumer) > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>David, Mr. Pool ;), what do you think about it? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>Cheers, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>Sacha > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
