So we all agree this is a good idea. Who's going to pick up the ball and run with it?
-dain Hiram Chirino wrote: > yes.. please.. jboss-mq would benefit also. > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain >>Sundstrom >>Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:56 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool >> >> >>I agree, but all of our stuff can use it. This would make it much >>easier to debug thread problems (like the interrupted bug). >> >>-dain >> >>Scott M Stark wrote: >> >>>Its a good idea to have such a service available, but using it cannot >>>be a requirement for integration at this point as in general we cannot >>>get a third party to use our thread pool. The pool component should >>>really just fall out of the JCA work. >>> >>>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>Scott Stark >>>Chief Technology Officer >>>JBoss Group, LLC >>>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>----- Original Message ----- >>>From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:21 AM >>>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>I think it would be cool to have a centralized thread pool mbean that >>>>anyone that needs a worker thread goes to. The pool would need to be >>>>partitioned, but that is fairly simple. >>>> >>>>What do you think? >>>> >>>>-dain >>>> >>>>Sacha Labourey wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Cool. But do you mean that each part/module of JBoss consuming threads >>>>>should hood in JCA? Isn't that overkill? >>>>> >>>>>For example, the invokers, great consumers of threads, will >>>> >>they need to >> >>>>>hook in JCA? How do you see that? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>-----Message d'origine----- >>>>>>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de >>>>>>David Jencks >>>>>>Envoy� : jeudi, 29 ao�t 2002 15:49 >>>>>>� : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>Objet : Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>One of the parts of jca 1.5 is a thread pool with transaction import >>>>>>capabilities. (Work contracts) I hope to get this committed >>>>> >>in the next >> >>>>>>couple of days, it's written and somewhat tested. >>>>>> >>>>>>david jencks >>>>>> >>>>>>On 2002.08.29 09:21:01 -0400 Sacha Labourey wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>As part of JBoss monitoring, the thread usage is a very interesting >>>>>>>indication. Furthermore, for performance reasons, having a >>>>>> >>thread pool >> >>>>>>>would >>>>>>>be a good thing (TM). >>>>>>> >>>>>>>What do you think about integrating a thread pool in JBoss? >>>>>> >>>>>>Parts such as >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>JavaGroups would also need to be integrated in this >>>>>> >>framework (JG is a >> >>>>>>>big >>>>>>>thread consumer) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>David, Mr. Pool ;), what do you think about it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Sacha ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
