I might be interested, although it sounds like something that's fairly quick and easy - so might be simpler for an existing developer to do it.
To clarify my understanding though - you're talking about a JMX service that pools threads. so a fairly simple pool with the obvious configuration options yes? If the relevant ppl who need threads could let know where they currently get threads, I'd be happy to get stuck into this tonight (GMT+10) and post a patch. cheers dim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 12:06 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool > So we all agree this is a good idea. > > Who's going to pick up the ball and run with it? > > -dain > > Hiram Chirino wrote: > > yes.. please.. jboss-mq would benefit also. > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain > >>Sundstrom > >>Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:56 AM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool > >> > >> > >>I agree, but all of our stuff can use it. This would make it much > >>easier to debug thread problems (like the interrupted bug). > >> > >>-dain > >> > >>Scott M Stark wrote: > >> > >>>Its a good idea to have such a service available, but using it cannot > >>>be a requirement for integration at this point as in general we cannot > >>>get a third party to use our thread pool. The pool component should > >>>really just fall out of the JCA work. > >>> > >>>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>Scott Stark > >>>Chief Technology Officer > >>>JBoss Group, LLC > >>>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>----- Original Message ----- > >>>From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:21 AM > >>>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>I think it would be cool to have a centralized thread pool mbean that > >>>>anyone that needs a worker thread goes to. The pool would need to be > >>>>partitioned, but that is fairly simple. > >>>> > >>>>What do you think? > >>>> > >>>>-dain > >>>> > >>>>Sacha Labourey wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Cool. But do you mean that each part/module of JBoss consuming threads > >>>>>should hood in JCA? Isn't that overkill? > >>>>> > >>>>>For example, the invokers, great consumers of threads, will > >>>> > >>they need to > >> > >>>>>hook in JCA? How do you see that? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>-----Message d'origine----- > >>>>>>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de > >>>>>>David Jencks > >>>>>>Envoy� : jeudi, 29 ao�t 2002 15:49 > >>>>>>� : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>Objet : Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss monitoring: Thread-Pool > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>One of the parts of jca 1.5 is a thread pool with transaction import > >>>>>>capabilities. (Work contracts) I hope to get this committed > >>>>> > >>in the next > >> > >>>>>>couple of days, it's written and somewhat tested. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>david jencks > >>>>>> > >>>>>>On 2002.08.29 09:21:01 -0400 Sacha Labourey wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Hello, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>As part of JBoss monitoring, the thread usage is a very interesting > >>>>>>>indication. Furthermore, for performance reasons, having a > >>>>>> > >>thread pool > >> > >>>>>>>would > >>>>>>>be a good thing (TM). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>What do you think about integrating a thread pool in JBoss? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Parts such as > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>JavaGroups would also need to be integrated in this > >>>>>> > >>framework (JG is a > >> > >>>>>>>big > >>>>>>>thread consumer) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>David, Mr. Pool ;), what do you think about it? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Cheers, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Sacha > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
