If you want to make it read only, will JBoss allow you to write the
remote interface such that it only has getters? The M-H book suggests
not even exposing the remote interface for enitity beans. Certainly it
would be preferable to have on the getters available to most clients.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> All,
>
> We often think of using Entity beans to represent rows or entities in
> a database, but not much else. Is it a good idea to use an entity
> bean to represent entries in an LDAP directory? I was thinking aboutu
> throwing together a BMP entity bean to do this. It would always be in
> a read-only mode on this, and I'd like to be able to take advantage of
> the caching features that would be available for 'free' within the
> container. I currently have a session bean in place that performs
> look ups and populates serializable data objects to return to the
> calling clients -- this could be simler if it could just be done via
> an entity bean.
>
> -Jason
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
