Adam Young wrote:
> If you want to make it read only, will JBoss allow you to write the
> remote interface such that it only has getters? The M-H book suggests
> not even exposing the remote interface for enitity beans. Certainly it
> would be preferable to have on the getters available to most clients.
A remote method is a remote method. There's nothing saying that an
entity has to be mutable at all
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> We often think of using Entity beans to represent rows or entities in
>> a database, but not much else. Is it a good idea to use an entity
>> bean to represent entries in an LDAP directory? I was thinking aboutu
>> throwing together a BMP entity bean to do this. It would always be in
>> a read-only mode on this, and I'd like to be able to take advantage of
>> the caching features that would be available for 'free' within the
>> container. I currently have a session bean in place that performs
>> look ups and populates serializable data objects to return to the
>> calling clients -- this could be simler if it could just be done via
>> an entity bean.
>>
>> -Jason
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
