On 2001.10.24 17:48:46 -0400 Dmitri Colebatch wrote: > On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, David Jencks wrote: > > > So, my question is, what do you gain by having a dispatcher? It seems > to > > me that most or all of the time it will be computing dynamically what > is > > set up statically in its absence. What kind of computations could it > do to > > determine the next task that would not be more appropriate in one of > the > > tasks? (the result of this computation by the task would be the > selection > > of the output queue). I could easily be missing the point, but I don't > get > > it yet. > > most likely scenario is that I'm thinking within my experience, and what > you are suggesting is probably a better way to do it... time for me to do > some more reading I think (o: > > remember I did start my initial post by stating that I was playing > catchup as far as MOM architectures were concerned (o: > > cheers, and thanks > dim
I've never actually designed a system like this, just read a bunch of books and thought quite a bit. My favorite books on this are High Performance Client-Server by Chris Loosley and Frank Douglas and Flow-based Programming by J Paul Morrison. Unfortunately I suspect they are both out of print - they are definitely pre j2ee. I wouldn't mind hearing about any good resources you come up with. Thanks David Jencks > > > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
