I'm sure you're sick of naming comments etc. by now, and it may be too late,
but:
In some ways using the word "mode" understates what JDE can do for you - it
makes it seem like just some formatting helper; the rich set of features is
better indicated by "development environment".
so, here are a couple more possibilities which retain that part:
JIDE [java integrated development environment]
eJIDE [emacs ...]
j-ide
Java-IDE
Iain.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Latchezar M. Dimitrov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 2:29 PM
> To: Paul Kinnucan
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Renaming Proposal
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I like jmode too. How about slight change with big consequencies?:-)
> That is, jdm (java development mode of course)?
>
> Thanks and sorry if it's too late.
>
> Latchezar
>
> PS. BTW, I've made a suggestion for j-d-e earlier but haven't
> heard any
> comments?
>
> >Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
> >From: William L Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:15:11 -0400
> >To: Paul Kinnucan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Renaming Proposal
> >
> >
> > jmode- is a good choice; could use jm- for an abbreviation if it's
> >not already in use in another emacs package.
> >
> >-WLA
> >
>
>
> Latchezar (Lucho) Dimitrov home: (336) 794-2094
>
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wfu.edu/~dimil01g/
>
> ... If you think education is expensive, try ignorance.
> -- Derek Bok, president of Harvard
>
