On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 7:54 AM Daniel Beck <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 2:17 PM Oliver Gondža <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Are there any objections to choosing 2.204 as the next baseline and iron >> out what to do about JENKINS-58993 in next two weeks? >> > > I agree this is the most pragmatic approach. > > That is my preference as well. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAMo7PtKh0z7hqv5LFF03HQkkj%3DTV57%2BAJviDZ%2B0QrmZC1RtgUA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAMo7PtKh0z7hqv5LFF03HQkkj%3DTV57%2BAJviDZ%2B0QrmZC1RtgUA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- Thanks! Mark Waite -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAO49JtH5_oSB2s48VjViRYbXUcXfqigWyWD0idynfhbfXy%2Bfew%40mail.gmail.com.
