Speed is something that you can adjust, but I don't find that mine is
running any slower than any other one. I think that public betas are fine,
but not if they don't listen to the bugs that we report. Now, they did
before putting out this one, but since this is going to be the released
one, obviously they did not pay any attention to the bugs that were
reported in this one. Therefore, this beta was a waste of time.
At 04:49 PM 10/15/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi listers.
>
>I'll first state that I am in no way affiliated with HJ. These are my
>thoughts, and are not meant to say good or bad about HJ or anybody else.
>
>I have been a member of this list for over two years, and I remember when a
>discussion of releasing a public beta came up. Most list members were in
>favor of having this beta to report on bugs and help HJ make a better
>product.
>
>My question is simple. Are public betas really needed? I do see the value
>of having this beta, because it gives us a chance to mention possible
>problems. It seems that a beta is simply being released as the final
>product, which doesn't make sense to me. For my part, 3.3122 worked better
>than the current release. By this, I refer to speed. That's just my
>opinion, though.
>
>It's something to consider.
>
>Kevin Minor
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
>
Walter
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
