Hmmm. That's a good question. Just something I noticed, here at the
University, now it might be just me. But, since Jfw has started using Msaa,
just in my opinion it loads faster than Window-Eyes. I haven't had a chance
to look at other screenreaders with Msaa, but comparing the two biggies, I
see a marked differenece in speed between the two.
Timothy Emmons Adaptive Technologies Consultant for the University of
Alabama in Huntsville
M Louis Salmon LIbrary, Huntsville Alabama, 35899
Phone: 256-890-6863, fax: 256-890-6083.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Poehlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 6:37 AM
Subject: Re: Opportunists are Lerking
> two things on this thread. I have used several screen readers and
> find that jfw is the most natural of them all with respect to how
> windows looks and feels to a blind person. take the jaws cursor for
> instance. although it doesn't act exactly the way we might want it
> to, it affords fairly effortless and intuitive techniques for
> manipulating the mouse pointer.
>
> Has anyone checked the speed of 331 against earlier releases or other
> screen readers with regard to loading web pages now that we use msaa?
> --
> Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
> Touching The Internet:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Voice: 301.949.7599
> ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman
> http://poehlman.clark.net
> Dynamic Solutions Inc.
> Best of service
> for your small business
> network needs!
> http://www.dnsolutions.com
>
> ---sig off---
> -
> Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
