chickenchickenlove commented on PR #20969: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/20969#issuecomment-3821823023
@mjsax , Hi! I apologize for the confusion. I intended to refer to [KAFKA-10716](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10716), but I mistakenly cited [KAFKA-10121](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10121) in the PR description. This was a clear oversight on my part. KAFKA-10716 highlighted that the `ProcessId` is unstable across `Kafka Streams` restarts, which can lead to unexpected and massive rebalances. To mitigate this, PRs associated with KAFKA-10716 were merged to persist the `ProcessId`. Sophie commented that this issue could be addressed once the design for `KAFKA-10121` is finalized. However, since KAFKA-10121 is still in an 'Open' state, I believe that persisting the `ProcessId`—as implemented in KAFKA-10716—remains a valid solution. What do you think? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
