showuon commented on a change in pull request #11691:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11691#discussion_r787413882



##########
File path: 
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/ProducerConfig.java
##########
@@ -514,11 +509,12 @@ public ProducerConfig(Map<String, Object> props) {
     }
 
     boolean idempotenceEnabled() {
-        boolean userConfiguredIdempotence = 
this.originals().containsKey(ENABLE_IDEMPOTENCE_CONFIG);
-        boolean userConfiguredTransactions = 
this.originals().containsKey(TRANSACTIONAL_ID_CONFIG);
-        boolean idempotenceEnabled = userConfiguredIdempotence && 
this.getBoolean(ENABLE_IDEMPOTENCE_CONFIG);
 
-        if (!idempotenceEnabled && userConfiguredIdempotence && 
userConfiguredTransactions)
+        boolean userConfiguredIdempotence = 
this.hasKeyInOriginals(ENABLE_IDEMPOTENCE_CONFIG);
+        boolean userConfiguredTransactions = 
this.hasKeyInOriginals(TRANSACTIONAL_ID_CONFIG);
+        boolean idempotenceEnabled = !userConfiguredIdempotence || 
this.getBoolean(ENABLE_IDEMPOTENCE_CONFIG);

Review comment:
       the key fix: before the PR, we only considered the `idempotenceEnabled` 
when user explicitly set the config and value to `true`:
   ```java
    boolean idempotenceEnabled = userConfiguredIdempotence && 
this.getBoolean(ENABLE_IDEMPOTENCE_CONFIG);
   ```
   Now, change it to fix the issue.
   ```java
   boolean idempotenceEnabled = !userConfiguredIdempotence || 
this.getBoolean(ENABLE_IDEMPOTENCE_CONFIG);
   ```




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to