Kate, what you wrote about cultural sensitivity is interesting. On the one hand, we have to be careful not to judge other cultures according to the rules we apply to ourselves, and the example you gave is a good one - of it being a cultural practice among Black Americans to shout during speeches to show approval. But in another way, it's important to recognize that human beings brought up with different cultural norms are human beings just like us, and sometimes, taking account of cultural differences can end up being patronizing, almost an inverse racism.

It's hard to know where to find the balance between recognizing and respecting cultural differences, but also having a baseline of some moral values that we're prepared to impose on everyone, as well as acknowledging that human beings everywhere deserve basic human rights. If we always respect cultural difference, then we'd end up having to respect the practice of female clitoridectomy, just to give one example.

Sarah


At 12:24 PM -0800 02/09/2003, Kate Bennett wrote:
"In covering the Afghanistan war, Pitts said, "I wanted to avoid the
temptation to label people with terms like 'savage,' words like that, which
journalists have used in the past to describe minority communities in the
United States. Those words are loaded with the biases of the reporter and
have no basis, and I didn't want to make the same mistake in referring to
the Afghanistan people." He remembered covering a Jesse Jackson speech in a
small southern church a few years ago, where the black audience was shouting
vehemently as Jackson talked. "Some of my colleagues thought these people
were upset and angry with Jackson, that because the people were shouting
they must have disagreed and were voicing their disapproval," Pitts said. "I
had to explain that in the culture of Black America, shouting was actually
their sign of total agreement with what Jackson had to say. I had to bring
the same sensitivity to covering the people and the war in Afghanistan."

Reply via email to