Dirk Stöcker wrote:
>> Or is there a deeper meaning? Please enlighten me. It's like this for
>> already three months. Could such an obvious bug hide that long?
>
> Why not :-) Would you feel artist enough to draw four little images
> instead of these texts?
So it is no bug? I would be happy with the symbols as they are now. The
point is, for example this enum entry:
tail_to_head ("<-->")
Should it really symbolize a relation tail to head? I would have guessed
it symbolizes "tail_to_tail", because the one side of the arrow ("->")
could be seen as a head (">"), the other side as tail ("-").
When compared to head_to_tail ("<-<-"), where the head of one relation
connects to the tail of another, I thought a tail_to_head would look
more like "->->".
But that symbol should be a tail_to_tail, according to the enum.
Quite confusing, isn't it?
I still think the symbols and the names do not fit. My suggestion is to
patch it to look like this:
7 head_to_head("-><-"),
8 tail_to_tail("<-->"),
9 head_to_tail("->->"),
10 tail_to_head("<-<-");
A line in the editor having that symbol "->->" would then show a way
connected to the next way (line below), the direction of the way
pointing in direction of the next way.
Stephan
_______________________________________________
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
