Just a curiosity, are you using indexOf with jQuery instances as well?
In this case line 411 of core.js
inArray: Array.prototype.indexOf ?
(function( indexOf ) {
return function( elem, array ) {
return indexOf.call( array, elem );
}
})( Array.prototype.indexOf ) :
function( elem, array ) {
for ( var i = 0, length = array.length; i < length; i++ ) {
if ( array[ i ] === elem ) {
return i;
}
}
return -1;
}
,
otherwise if this function supposes to work only with array (due to explicit
name) just this:
inArray: Array.prototype.indexOf ?
function( elem, array ) {
return array.indexOf( elem );
} :
function( elem, array ) {
for ( var i = 0, length = array.length; i < length; i++ ) {
if ( array[ i ] === elem ) {
return i;
}
}
return -1;
}
,
I am sure they'll follow this logic so I would not worry about trunk.
Regards
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:13 PM, lrbabe <lrb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Nice Andrea.
>
> In such case it would be valuable to have jQuery on Git or another
> DVCS.
> I could simply pull from you instead of re-creating the patch for
> myself, since I use inArray quite a lot in my project and don't want
> to wait for this improvement to be committed to the trunk. Sizzle is
> already on Github, why not jQuery?
> Sorry, I'm even more OT...
>
> Louis-Rémi
>
> On Sep 3, 12:42 pm, Andrea Giammarchi <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Sorry guys, a little OT for jQuery developers:
> > guys did you get the fact jQuery.inArray could be easily optimized? The
> code
> > I posted does not exist in the latest jQuery core.js file, you are using
> the
> > loop version for every browser - it's a quick improvement, I would go for
> it
> > :D
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:20 PM, ludovic <ludothebe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > @THD
> > > I agree with the principle of creating your own precompilation syntax,
> > > but not to have a regression, it would be preferrable to use features
> > > detection.
> >
> > > inArray = function( elem, array ) {
> >
> > > /* @if support indexOf
> > > * Creates correct inArray function when browser does not support
> > > native
> > > array.indexOf
> > > * Use === because on IE, window == document
> > > */
> > > for ( var i = 0, length = array.length; i < length; i++ )
> > > if ( array[ i ] === elem )
> > > return i;
> > > return -1;
> > > /* @else */
> > > return array.indexOf(elem);
> > > /* @ */
> > > }
> >
> > > And create a database of correspondances between features support and
> > > browsers. Then, when you want to create your IE file, you search in
> > > your correspondances what features are known to be supported by the IE
> > > version, and then, excecute precomputation tests by replacing features
> > > detection by the value.
> >
> > > It would cost much less work to make the migration of jquery as
> > > features detection are already managed.
> >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ludovic
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
