Jack, I'll take a look Chris, I *think* the timing code I've added in my sample above is only timing the template step ?
I've had the opportunity to try this out this afternoon on a number of machines in the organization, and noted a couple of things... Its quick in FF3 (which I didn't expect given what I have been reading) Its *usually* a lot slower in IE than FF, but some machines are the opposite. So, I need to revise the question : what browser configuration changes, plugins, settings etc might make a *huge* difference to inter- browser performance ? I'll see if JavaScriptTemplates looks like I can integrate it, and re- test. TIA Andrew On Jun 26, 6:02 pm, "chris thatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andiih, just curious becuase I use jtemplates and havent seen that issue, > though can you verify that the slow code is not 'xmlToJSON'. I have seen > the marshalling process take up a lot of time in IE when the xml is > substantial in size . > > Thatcher > > > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Jack Killpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't know how it compares as far as speed, but you might want to try > > this: > > >http://code.google.com/p/trimpath/wiki/JavaScriptTemplates > > > We've been using it for more than a year on many of our projects, including > > some with large table row outputs, and it's worked for us. > > > - Jack > > > Andiih wrote: > > >> I am using jTemplates (jquery-jtemplates.js) to render a large xml > >> response by running xmlToJSON then processTemplate. Although the code > >> works fine, and performance in FF2.0 is acceptable (2672ms) on my test > >> system, I am getting a result of 9827ms when running in IE7. Is there > >> a known performance issue with jtemplates ? Are other templte modules > >> better ? > > >> (p.s. the real world code uses jQuery Form plugin and web services, > >> but the sample below reproduces the issue) > > >> Code, and template follow. > > > ... snip... > > -- > Christopher Thatcher
