Arrrgggh. You know when you read the same lines of code again and
again and can't see the obvious....you are of course correct, I'm
timing both. I will give your code a try.
On Jun 27, 12:03 am, "chris thatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I think you are measuring the combined time. Try this:
>
> var xmltojson_start = new Date().getTime();
> ret = $.xmlToJSON(responseXML);
> var xmltojson_stop = new Date().getTime();
>
> var template_start = new Date().getTime();
> $('#output2').processTemplate(ret);
> var template_stop = new Date().getTime();
> alert("****************************************"+
> "\n\tXml to Json: " + (xmltojson_stop - xmltojson_start) +
> "\n\tTemplate Processing: " + (template_stop - template_start) +
> "\n********************************************");
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Andiih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jack, I'll take a look
> > Chris, I *think* the timing code I've added in my sample above is only
> > timing the template step ?
>
> > I've had the opportunity to try this out this afternoon on a number of
> > machines in the organization, and noted a couple of things...
> > Its quick in FF3 (which I didn't expect given what I have been
> > reading)
> > Its *usually* a lot slower in IE than FF, but some machines are the
> > opposite.
>
> > So, I need to revise the question : what browser configuration
> > changes, plugins, settings etc might make a *huge* difference to inter-
> > browser performance ?
>
> > I'll see if JavaScriptTemplates looks like I can integrate it, and re-
> > test.
>
> > TIA
>
> > Andrew
>
> > On Jun 26, 6:02 pm, "chris thatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Andiih, just curious becuase I use jtemplates and havent seen that issue,
> > > though can you verify that the slow code is not 'xmlToJSON'. I have seen
> > > the marshalling process take up a lot of time in IE when the xml is
> > > substantial in size .
>
> > > Thatcher
>
> > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Jack Killpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > I don't know how it compares as far as speed, but you might want to try
> > > > this:
>
> > > >http://code.google.com/p/trimpath/wiki/JavaScriptTemplates
>
> > > > We've been using it for more than a year on many of our projects,
> > including
> > > > some with large table row outputs, and it's worked for us.
>
> > > > - Jack
>
> > > > Andiih wrote:
>
> > > >> I am using jTemplates (jquery-jtemplates.js) to render a large xml
> > > >> response by running xmlToJSON then processTemplate. Although the code
> > > >> works fine, and performance in FF2.0 is acceptable (2672ms) on my test
> > > >> system, I am getting a result of 9827ms when running in IE7. Is there
> > > >> a known performance issue with jtemplates ? Are other templte modules
> > > >> better ?
>
> > > >> (p.s. the real world code uses jQuery Form plugin and web services,
> > > >> but the sample below reproduces the issue)
>
> > > >> Code, and template follow.
>
> > > > ... snip...
>
> > > --
> > > Christopher Thatcher
>
> --
> Christopher Thatcher
