For some reason my VPN is "moody" this weekend and I can't get in to
play :-) . I agree the JavaScriptTemplates looks close enough to be a
search/replace type fix. I will try the static textarea approach 1st
though: Although I like the separation of elements that the external
files give me. Of course I could load the text areas up dynamically
earlier on in the process....
Until monday then, and thanks for all the help so far: I will let you
know what I find.
On Jun 27, 1:11 pm, "chris thatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Andiih, I had one more thought. I don't usually setTemplateURL abd
> ibstead use setTemplateElement and have the template locally in a hidden
> text area. I was wondering if it might be the difference because of the
> network communication that occurs in your case. Might be worth a try to see
> if thats the extra time drain.
>
> Also JavaScriptTemplates from trimpath is a really great template engine as
> well and really not too different syntatically than jTemplate so you should
> be able to modify your templates relatively easily to use them if that what
> you decide to do.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:53 AM, Andiih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Machine A
> > FF3 xml to json 1380, Template Processing 619
> > IE6 xml to json 1782, Template Processing 22593
>
> > Machine B
> > IE7 xml to json 765, Template Processing 8579
> > FF2 xml to json 2094, Template Processing 1492
> > FF3 Beta xml to json 1151, Template Processing 1054
>
> > Machine C
> > IE 7 Xml to json 1187, Template Processing 9344
> > FF 2 Xml to json 3281, Template Processing 1328
>
> > OK - its the tempaltes. Will try the other template engine above...or
> > perhaps I should consider xml/xsl and skip the json step ? I think I
> > saw a jQuery xls processor somewhere...
>
> > On Jun 27, 12:03 am, "chris thatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > I think you are measuring the combined time. Try this:
>
> > > var xmltojson_start = new Date().getTime();
> > > ret = $.xmlToJSON(responseXML);
> > > var xmltojson_stop = new Date().getTime();
>
> > > var template_start = new Date().getTime();
> > > $('#output2').processTemplate(ret);
> > > var template_stop = new Date().getTime();
> > > alert("****************************************"+
> > > "\n\tXml to Json: " + (xmltojson_stop - xmltojson_start) +
> > > "\n\tTemplate Processing: " + (template_stop - template_start)
> > +
> > > "\n********************************************");
>
> > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Andiih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Jack, I'll take a look
> > > > Chris, I *think* the timing code I've added in my sample above is only
> > > > timing the template step ?
>
> > > > I've had the opportunity to try this out this afternoon on a number of
> > > > machines in the organization, and noted a couple of things...
> > > > Its quick in FF3 (which I didn't expect given what I have been
> > > > reading)
> > > > Its *usually* a lot slower in IE than FF, but some machines are the
> > > > opposite.
>
> > > > So, I need to revise the question : what browser configuration
> > > > changes, plugins, settings etc might make a *huge* difference to inter-
> > > > browser performance ?
>
> > > > I'll see if JavaScriptTemplates looks like I can integrate it, and re-
> > > > test.
>
> > > > TIA
>
> > > > Andrew
>
> > > > On Jun 26, 6:02 pm, "chris thatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Andiih, just curious becuase I use jtemplates and havent seen that
> > issue,
> > > > > though can you verify that the slow code is not 'xmlToJSON'. I have
> > seen
> > > > > the marshalling process take up a lot of time in IE when the xml is
> > > > > substantial in size .
>
> > > > > Thatcher
>
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Jack Killpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > I don't know how it compares as far as speed, but you might want to
> > try
> > > > > > this:
>
> > > > > >http://code.google.com/p/trimpath/wiki/JavaScriptTemplates
>
> > > > > > We've been using it for more than a year on many of our projects,
> > > > including
> > > > > > some with large table row outputs, and it's worked for us.
>
> > > > > > - Jack
>
> > > > > > Andiih wrote:
>
> > > > > >> I am using jTemplates (jquery-jtemplates.js) to render a large xml
> > > > > >> response by running xmlToJSON then processTemplate. Although the
> > code
> > > > > >> works fine, and performance in FF2.0 is acceptable (2672ms) on my
> > test
> > > > > >> system, I am getting a result of 9827ms when running in IE7. Is
> > there
> > > > > >> a known performance issue with jtemplates ? Are other templte
> > modules
> > > > > >> better ?
>
> > > > > >> (p.s. the real world code uses jQuery Form plugin and web
> > services,
> > > > > >> but the sample below reproduces the issue)
>
> > > > > >> Code, and template follow.
>
> > > > > > ... snip...
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Christopher Thatcher
>
> > > --
> > > Christopher Thatcher
>
> --
> Christopher Thatcher- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
