this is awesome...when can i have it for my own implementation...:) i am dying to integrate it in my site
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Jim Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre, > > 1) Great point - I'm going to mess around with having more fixed > dimensions. Nothing is fixed vertically and I want to toy around with text > wrapping in an individual cell and see how that affects sizing and > animation. > > 2) In the current iteration It seems 500 is the breaking point. The thing > that bogs it down is the traversal across the rows with get and set of the > cell contents. I want to find faster way to do this for the sake of speed. > The animation actually is fast with 500+ rows - it's just re-populating the > new sorted set of data. The natural sort itself is super fast - it's still > just this per-cell traversal and manipulation. I'll obviously need to sample > this on slower machines against all the browsers to guage the speed. > > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Alexandre Plennevaux < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> very nice indeed ! >> >> 1/ when going to the last page, the table height adapts to the number of >> rows. It would be better that the table height does not vary i think >> 2/ What's the maximum amount of rows do you think it is safe to work with? >> I suppose beyond a certain level, the table will feel unresponsive >> >> thanks for sharing ! >> >> >> Alexandre Plennevaux >> LAb[au] >> >> http://www.lab-au.com >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:09 AM, num <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> My proof of concept >>> >>> >>> http://www.overset.com/2008/08/30/animated-sortable-datagrid-jquery-plugin-jtps/ >>> >>> I haven't yet seen html scrolling animation like this non-flash or >>> flex. This is essentially an unreleased jquery plugin that you can >>> attach to an already created table that will allow for sorting and >>> pagination. The animation is sensitive to the page delta, i.e. it will >>> scroll faster if you go from page 1 to 5 than from page 1 to 2. The >>> core of the animation is really a queued style.display: ( 'none' || >>> '' ) and given the delay by hijacking the .animate() functionality as >>> many have used in the past. It feels somewhat dirty but is easier than >>> programming another whole setTimeout management layer for this. >>> >>> I put a bit of work on coding an intelligent sort that is similar to >>> php's old natural sort (STRING_SORT) and is faster (as of some initial >>> testing) than other implementations I've seen. >>> >>> I'm going to re-vamp the re-drawing of the table rows to make this >>> faster considering how slow it currently is.. but the animation of the >>> pagination is something I wanted to throw out there for some feedback. >>> >>> It's currently floating around 10KB un-minified and well commented >>> >>> Cheers >>> >> >> >> >> > -- > Jim Palmer ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Thanks & Regards Faizal (001)919 889 1980 when nothing works , prayer does.
