Glad to help.
It's nothing specific to jQuery, of course. Here's a simplified test case:
var Test = function() {};
Test.prototype.foo = function() { alert('bar'); };
var test = new Test;
test.foo(); // alerts 'bar'
var Test = function() {};
var test = new Test;
test.foo(); // TypeError: test.foo is not a function
That's basically the same scenario you ran into with the two jQuerys - it's
just easier to see the problem here.
-Mike
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Paulodemoc <paulode...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Omg, I can't believe that was the problem.... You guys are the best :P
> I didn't know this particularity about jQuery... it's logical
> though....
> Thanks you all for the help and your time.
>
> Att.
>
> Paulo Henrique
>
> ;)
>
> On Dec 2, 4:09 am, Michael Geary <m...@mg.to> wrote:
> > Don't feel bad. You made it easy for me. Since you'd already done some
> > investigating and ruled out a number of possibilities, all I had to do
> was
> > look at the one or two things you might have missed! :-)
> >
> > On a more serious note, this thread is a great example of why we keep
> asking
> > people to post a link to a test page. Without the test page, we were just
> > taking wild guesses. Once the test page was posted, all it took was a
> couple
> > of us taking a quick look at it, and bingo!
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > On Dec 1, 5:31 pm, Michael Geary <m...@mg.to> wrote:
> > > > Paulo, you're loading jQuery twice. First you load jQuery, then you
> load
> > > > your plugins, then you load jQuery again. That second load of jQuery
> > > wipes
> > > > out the original jQuery and all its plugins.
> >
> > > > Do a View Source on your page with the sort photos link, and search
> for:
> >
> > > And I missed that? D'Oh! :-)
> >
> > > -- Scott
>
